Replies

From your second link (Harun Yahya's answer to Sciam's answers):

Scientific American's "15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense" is just such an example of "avoiding the truth." Right from the start, a number of those questions reveal that this is what is going on:
"Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law."
"Evolution is unscientific, because it is not testable or falsifiable. It makes claims about events that were not observed and can never be re-created."
"If humans descended from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?"
None of the above are objections expressed by critics of the theory of evolution.

Huh? Harun Yahya (thought to be a pseudonym for a slew of different authors) has never seen an FR crevo thread.

You know what? I'm amazed that this is still going on here in this forum. Of course, it's a great debate. And it has the advantage of attracting a large number of people who want to post replys, but this horse has been beat to death!

Over and Over!

Again and Again!

There's three groups. One is fully for Creationism. One is fully for Evolution. The third believes we really don't know yet.

I rank amongst the third. It took a little while for you folks to appreciate that, the last time I posted on a thread such as this. I'm still of the opinion that we do not know what happened. Punk tu lated evolution, evolution, creation, we just don't know.

We have text, we have fossils, and, we just don't have a resolution.

It's amazing to me the number of posts that these threads create (or evolve into). To tell you the truth, I'm just LOL! at the whole thing.

The Monkey Trials on Free Republic!!!!

Find it here!