Posted on 08/09/2002 6:53:36 AM PDT by xsysmgr
In the current political climate, it is tempting to maintain the taboos on those historical subjects that could be easily exploited by xenophobes. One such taboo is dhimmitude, which resulted when Christians and Jews (dhimmis), in addition to other non-Muslim, indigenous peoples, were conquered by jihad wars, and henceforth "tolerated" and "protected" as subjects of Islam. This "tolerance" and "protection," however, was afforded only upon submission to Islamic domination by a dhimma, or pact, which imposed discriminatory and humiliating regulations. The main principles of dhimmitude are: (1) the inequality of rights in all domains between Muslims and dhimmis; (2) the social and economic discrimination against the dhimmis; (3) the degradation and vulnerability of the dhimmis.
Dhimmitude has existed for 13 centuries in the Muslim empire established, primarily, on former Christian lands. Extending over three continents — Africa, Asia, and Europe — this field of history was the setting for jihad, the Crusades, Reconquista, and the Balkan and Israeli wars of independence. Countless populations, swept along in the whirlwind of centuries, were marked in the crucible from which issued the death of civilizations and the birth of others. Dhimmitude convulsed the whole 19th century, and Europe — as obsessed as it was divided — floundered in endless debates on the Eastern Question: how to put an end to dhimmitude.
World War I affected a 180-degree turn. Colonial imperatives, World War II and the Cold War, oil, economic, geostrategic and religious interests in the Muslim world — all combined to suppress this history. Today, a heightened desire for security recommends leaving this cadaver to rot in its bandages of lies and oblivion. Is amnesia not preferable, particularly during the crisis period we currently live in? Not at all. A candid discussion of this history of dhimmitude, which embraces the three-dimensional relationship of the People of the Bible — Jews and Christians — and of the Koran, is essential if current ideological conflicts are to be unraveled and deadlocks broken.
Let us hope we have not missed the opportunity to talk frankly and initiate that critical dialogue with the Muslim elites about dogmas and jurisdictions that were so traumatic for the "People of the Book" — Jews and Christians, whom Islam joined together in the same dhimmi status — "protected" and "tolerated," because subjugated and humiliated. It is imperative for Jews, Christians, and Muslims to explore together the cruel episodes in this shared history in order to alleviate, if not eliminate, the cultural conflicts in which religious fanaticism takes root.
Following the cataclysmic events of September 11there has been a tendency to recall nebulous "Golden Ages" of idyllic multi-religious societies, invented so effectively, that today one feels defenseless and disoriented, when brought face-to-face with the conflicts from another age, deliberately erased from history. We must forego this whitewashing and opt instead for a shared, candid reflection on the past to unite us in a joint effort for peace and mutual respect. The history of dhimmitude, so long repressed by our collective cowardice, is unfolding around us, before our very eyes. It is claiming victims in Algeria, Egypt, Palestine, Lebanon, the Sudan, Nigeria, Iran, Pakistan, Kashmir, the Philippines, Indonesia, and elsewhere. It even forms part of our daily lives, governed by antiterrorist measures in the United States, Europe, and now worldwide, and it wreaks havoc among the Muslim elites, responsible for having concealed it. This forbidden history, banished from memory, is casting its dark shadow over the world's future.
Dhimmitude must be discussed in academia, the media, and elsewhere, without apology. This frank discussion will allow Muslim intellectuals to rethink their whole relationship with the People of the Bible — and non-Muslims in general — without renouncing their faith, and uniting all peoples in the fight against tyrannical oppression and dehumanization. In the absence of such genuine interfaith dialogue, I fear the 21st century will become a bloodbath, in which civilizations will continue to collide.
— Bat Yeor is the author of three books on jihad and dhimmitude, The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians Under Islam (1985), The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam: From Jihad to Dhimmitude(1996), and Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide (2002). Andrew G. Bostom, M.D., associate professor of medicine at Brown University Medical School contributed to this essay.
So is the entire world if Islam is allowed to spread its freedom-snuffing ways. Under Islam, there will be no free choice. Whenever Islam has gotten a foothold, fanatical religious police enforce the most absurd rules and regulations and claim that it is the will of allah. Look at how backward, corrupt and pathetic all of the so-called Islamic countries have become under the "guidance" of Saudi Arabian Whabbism that is so popular with the majority of ignorant Muslims today. Yeah, present-day Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq are about as successful as, say, the Soviet Union was under Stalin. There was a reason that many Afghanis were thrilled to have the Taliban booted out by the US.
I posted on several threads that a devout Muslim's most fervent wish is to conquer, via bloody jihad, all nations and subject everyone to a barbaric 7th-Century Sharia (Islamic law) that entails public lashings, stoning to death, (Monica Lewinsky would not be spared for her adulterous relationship. Bill might have been given a reprieve, but not so for a lowly female) lopping off of limbs and judgements that are carried out by a bunch of hypocritical religious fanatics known as Imams. Anyone who does not convert to Islam is considered a second-class citizen (that's putting it mildly) and is subject to an infidel-tax, rape, enslavement or being killed by a Muslim with little, if any, consequences.
That 12th Century bunk about Islam's "Golden Age" and how everybody just got along with each other is just another Muslim LIE. Infidels were kept around only if it was economically expedient to do so. Lying to, ambushing, raping, looting from, cheating, betraying, and murdering an infidel is OK according to the Koran if one is a Muslim.
If the people of the world don't awaken soon to reality, they're going to awaken sooner than they think to the nightmare of Islam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.