Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
A British fort in Boston Harbor WAS legitimate English property in 1777. Why would it not be?

Cause of a little document signed in 1776. But then again, I guess things like that don't matter to persons such as yourself who take a "might makes right" view of the world in all cases except when might is exercised to expunge a hostile army from a strategic position inside the borders of the rebelling country.

525 posted on 08/22/2002 10:40:11 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
A British fort in Boston Harbor WAS legitimate English property in 1777. Why would it not be?

Cause of a little document signed in 1776.

You should promulgate such a document. Then you wouldn't have to pay any more taxes, right?

Walt

537 posted on 08/23/2002 4:34:03 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson