Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
You did NOT refute the article, ergo, one could rightly or wrongly assume that you agreed with it; entirely. This is especially true, due to the nature of your statement that this was an interesting article.

Ahhhh... Finally!!!! That's all I was looking for. I just wanted to see your reasoning for assuming this. Since I didn't know about this whole refute the article business (BTW, not everyone here does it), I was shocked when people were making assumptions based on something I hadn't said. I'll know for next time. As for finding it interesting, I guess i should have clarified that further.

Being called a " sleeper ", is in no way an insult !

Alright. I felt insulted as I interpeted this to mean I was a liberal greenie trying to infiltrate this site (the term "sleeper cell" kept poping into my head). I hate Liberals/Greenies. I hope you can understand this. And yes I've seen the other insults being thrown around.

As for the amount I've read on FR. I've been lurking for quite some time before I signed up. Many people do not clearly state their position. Thus, I didn't think I had to. Oh well. I see your points. I just wish you said that in the first place.

52 posted on 08/09/2002 11:11:31 PM PDT by enrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland
Being smart is, in itself, no defense against skilled American propaganda, unless you know and understand the techniques, so you can resist them.
Mind the salesmen...
53 posted on 08/10/2002 12:46:12 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson