True. Your right about the possibility bit. But stating it is probable? C'mon.... You should be able to realise the implication of that.
A stated FACT, is NOT an insult.
True. Now point to the post that PROVES i'm a sleeper. You also said "Look, no one has flamed nor insulted you". Metesky did call me a sleeper. So yes someone did insult me. If you're not insulted by such a name, thats fine by me.
You most assuredly appeared to not understand the posted article.
OK. This is getting rediculous. Just tell me one thing. Do you base this on the fact that I did NOT state my position regarding the article? If so, fair enough. Just say it. I wasn't aware of the need to immediately state my position.
You certainly do NOT know the rules for posting.
Well. Point me in the right direction then.
And NO , that is NOT against the rules. :-)
Fine. But personal attacks are against the rules. I consider being called a sleeper a personal attack. Although you didn't quite say it, Metesky did and that's why I became aggravated. BTW, I was a happy little poster up until that accusation.
When I said "Your right about the possibility bit" I wasn't agreeing that it is possible. I am NOT a sleeper. But you are correct that you only agreed to it being a possibility.
You did NOT refute the article, ergo, one could rightly or wrongly assume that you agreed with it; entirely. This is especially true, due to the nature of your statement that this was an interesting article. Being called a " sleeper ", is in no way an insult ! This could denote the fact that you are a shill for this veiw and agenda. I agreed that it was possible ; I saw NOTHING, from you, to refute that assumption. The " proof ", that you are asking for, is to be found in your own posts / lack thereof ! By your words, you are known. Thus far ...NOT a pretty picture.
If you need an example of a personal attack, go read more threads. Some are worse than others. And calling someone a " sleeper ", is so far removed , from a personal attack / insult, as to be laughable.