You mean anyone who doe's not agree with you is a disruptor? Maybe you should get over to DU where people of your mindset dominate. The biggest disinformation clown ever on FR was Michael Rivero. His blame it on the Navy garbage prevented a serious look at a man pad taking out 800 from ever being taken. If you can find it get the book Stinger. It was published in the late eighties, can't remember the author. Great read. What happened to 800 is described in the book only years earier and as a novel.
Gee, if the shoe fits. Disruptors are already screened by the able folks who have volunteered to keep this a civil forum...and a valuable one based on the 'signal to static' ratio. Disinformants are typically paid to produce static...perpetuating falsehoods, and confusion and complacency. Those on the payroll for Disinformation Ops, betray a key tactic when they engage in ad hominem attacks after attempting to personally smear even the most-respectable and professsional lead researchers, or raise a quibble into a mountainous objection, in any dispute over whatever controversy they are attempting to keep quelled. The 'cover story' has to be upheld at all costs.
As to man-portable SAMs taking out TWA Flight 800 I will keep an open mind. But SOME missile, from somewhere, appears from the overwhelming amount of information discovered to date to be the culprit. So I will reserve judgment as to all options. BTW: If it was a Navy fiasco (which I truly pray it wasn't) ... can you honestly say, from all we know about him, that Bill Clinton would not have done EXACTLY the same illegal stuff to keep a lid on it for his political momentum? (Can't you just hear Carville sneeringly say, It's the economy, stupid!).