[hedgetrimmer]

The UN, and international NGOs have defined sustainable. It merely means that if you are a sustainable society, you are a socialist society and all private property belongs to NGOs or the government. See, folks who believe in sustainability don't believe that you common people can take care of land or property in the "correct" way. Therefore the government or some annointed land conservancy must take it away and do it for you.

"Sustainable Development is nothing but pure Socialism in a Green cloak. Too many Conservatives throughout the nation are either falling for the deception or ignoring it. This is the current crisis of the Conservative movement. "
--Tom DeWeese

[hedgetrimmer]

See post #37

[cogitator]

See, folks who believe in sustainability don't believe that you common people can take care of land or property in the "correct" way.

Do you think that slash-and-burn agricultural practices in rain forests constitute taking care of property the "correct" way?

Here's an example of what such practices look like near Rio Branco, Brazil, which is near the border with northeastern Bolivia.