Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China, A Land Divided: A middle class rises in the cities, leaving the masses behind (all 3 parts)
Long Island Newsday | August 4,5,6, 2002 | Edward A. Gargan

Posted on 08/07/2002 8:58:07 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Beijing, China -- Two blocks from the paddle-boaters on Beijing's Back Lake, which once was lined with monasteries and is now the preserve of Communist Party bigwigs and the newly wealthy, Luo Yu hurried to a class at the Central Drama Academy, her long braided hair flapping behind her.

The harried 19-year-old juggles a schedule familiar to her contemporaries in the West: driving lessons, ballet practice, recitals, boyfriends.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: chinastuff; clashofcivilizatio; zanupf

1 posted on 08/07/2002 8:58:07 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *China stuff; *china_stuff; *Clash of Civilizatio
Index Bump
2 posted on 08/07/2002 11:18:05 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
In 1979, China set a radical new course when Deng Xiaoping, the successor to Mao, effectively began to dismantle doctrinaire communism by declaring that "it matters not if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice" --

With that statement has China ever abandoned its strategic goals for ultimate super power and power over Asia? What is the "mouse" they are after?

China did not abandon its goal of a utopic China, they just tried a different method of getting there.

The only way they can do what they so desire... is to oppose the US.

3 posted on 08/07/2002 11:29:43 AM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
"it matters not if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice"

He is simply talking about economics here, not world conquest, as your paranoid mind believes. He is saying the economic system employed by a country is not so important as long as it produced real concrete benefits for its citizens in terms of improved standard of living, quality of life, etc.

4 posted on 08/07/2002 8:16:02 PM PDT by AIG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Thank you for posting this excellent three-part article.
5 posted on 08/07/2002 9:05:11 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
It is clear that China has the greatest income discrepancy of the world because it diverts its cash from U.S. trade to Russia for offensive weaponry, leaving its people with little.
6 posted on 08/07/2002 9:07:24 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Its not only spent on weapons, but thats the jist of it. The government buys and spends. Everything is the government. The people are there to support the government, not the other way around. Its 100% facist.
7 posted on 08/07/2002 9:18:05 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
As long as the party bosses have big money, and their families can drive their nice cars, "everything is fine" no matter how many people are hurting or starving in the countryside.

The problems are out of sight, and out of mind, except of course the party fears having the common man getting organized and pissed off that them.

8 posted on 08/07/2002 9:22:40 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
leaving its people with little.

Are u kidding me? Obviously, you've never been to China. 100 mil. Chinese today enjoy a standard of living on par with S. Korea. 20 years ago, you couldn't say that. In the next 20 years, you'll see 200-300 mil. with a First World standard of living. Economic development doesn't happen overnight, but it's a process.

9 posted on 08/08/2002 9:07:04 PM PDT by AIG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
20 years ago, over 90% of China's people were peasants. Today, it's about 67%. As time goes on, more and more Chinese will move to China's cities and join China's growing middle-class.
10 posted on 08/08/2002 9:09:23 PM PDT by AIG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson