Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TankerKC
I'm quite aware that miscarriages are common. However, the fact that this woman fought to have an abortion, then "miscarried" immediately after the court allowed it is suspicious.

Why? If she was going to have an abortion, she would have had the abortion, no?

Also, TKC, your hypocrisy re name calling is a little obvious, considering you called the woman who had the miscarriage a "bitch of a woman who wanted to murder her child."

20 posted on 08/07/2002 12:33:48 PM PDT by eaglebeak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: eaglebeak; TankerKC
Why? If she was going to have an abortion, she would have had the abortion, no?

Well, the injunction was issued and then reversed. I think we all know that there are things a woman can do to "force" a miscarriage. Who's to say she hadn't done something to force a miscarriage during the injunction, not knowing that it would be lifted, and once it was, it was too late?

21 posted on 08/07/2002 12:38:16 PM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: eaglebeak
Why? If she was going to have an abortion, she would have had the abortion, no?

Unless she didn't want the public shame of actually having the abortion. So, she has it then claims she had a miscarriage. Just speculation on my part.

31 posted on 08/07/2002 3:16:34 PM PDT by TankerKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson