To: Catspaw
Catspaw, I actually agree with your analysis. And in no place on this thread (or any other thread) will you find that I said that the courts were wise to compel the woman either way. However, you are confusing legality with morality. I agree with your legal argument 100%. I also soundly condemn this woman as a hypocrite and a harlot. She was in the right legally. Morally she is bankrupt, and should be recognized as such.
To: Under the Radar
Actually, if she's a harlot, he's a whoremonger. Both had indiscriminate, out-of-wedlock sex and out of that came a baby.
163 posted on
08/08/2002 7:43:04 AM PDT by
Catspaw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson