Posted on 08/06/2002 8:55:10 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
Course overview:
History 501 focuses on historiography, historical method, and history as a professional discipline. Central to our inquiries will be historiography, the differing schools of history that develop around a given subject. Historians often investigate the same information but arrive at markedly different conclusions, or find additional information that adds new understanding to the study of a subject. The class will discuss some of the influences that cause historians to make what are often contrasting arguments. Additionally, students will learn how scholars go about evaluating another scholars work. Moreover, students themselves will engage in this evaluation process by writing a review of Michael Bellesiles work, Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture. This book is available at the Campus Bookstore and the Other Bookstore. There is also a required Course Packet that is available at the Other Bookstore only.
The other main component of this course deals with the use of primary and secondary sources. We will hold at least one class in the library, both to learn about where sources are located and to work with reference, government document, and inter-library loan librarians to discover what types of collections are held by both our library and other libraries in the area. -- The course will culminate in a major research project that incorporates the research and historiographic skills learned and discussed in class. The student and instructor should agree upon a project within the first week or two of class. All topics must be on Connecticut or New England history unless the student has special permission to engage in an alternative subject.
Class Assignments:
(These assignments are explained in more detail in the Course Packet.)
1) A 3-5 page book review of Michael Bellesiles, Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture. Worth 15% of the final grade.
2) A 5-7 page review essay on Michael Bellesiles, Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture. Worth 25% of the final grade.
3) Formal Prospectus for Final Paper. Worth 15% of the final grade.
4) Student Commentaries. Worth 5% of the final grade. Failure to provide your peer commentators with a copy of your paper on the assigned day will result in a full grade reduction on your final paper.
5) A 20 page primary research/historiographic final paper. Worth 40% of the final grade.
....
Explanation of Course Assignments:
1) A 3-5 page book review of Michael Bellesiles, Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture. Worth 15% of the final grade.
· This review should be written without investigating any other reviews of Bellesiles work. The purpose of the assignment is to determine what you, as a reader, take away from Bellesiles argument. Indeed, this is one of the keys of any book review. Students need to first identify Bellesiles argument, then evaluate it. Is it logical? Does he support it with good evidence? Is the book easily understood? These are just some of the points that a reviewer should consider. Please see the section on Understanding and Writing Book Reviews, that follows the explanation of class assignments. (Make sure that you follow proper citation format when reviewing Bellesiles book.)
2) A 5-7 page review essay on Michael Bellesiles, Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture. Worth 25% of the final grade.
· After a thorough class discussion in which students have researched five reviews and or articles on Bellesiles work, students will write a 5-7 page review essay incorporating new ideas gleaned from the class discussions and the writings of scholars. Thus your essay should take into account new arguments that may alter your original conclusions regarding Bellesiles. (Make sure that you follow proper citation format when writing your essay. You will be incorporating new sources into your paper and must cite everything correctly.)
....
(Excerpt) Read more at history.ccsu.edu ...
...as the students add to Bellesiles' bank account, since his book, obviously, would be a mandatory purchase for the class.
I agree this is disturbing. However, I take solace in the fact that most, if not all, college campus bookstores will buy back the books and recycle them. I like to think that the same, worn and recycled copies are making the rounds semester after semester.....
· This review should be written without investigating any other reviews of Bellesiles work.
Imagine a sincere liberal skull-full-of-mush following this instruction, going ga-ga over Bellesiles' con, and writing a pean of praise for it!And then . . .
And then . . .
Oh, yes. Academia is really, really angry at Bellesiles in its own stodgy way - the problem isn't just the humiliation of having bought into an outright fraud, it's that it will cause the unwashed to look askance at any future pronunciamentos issuing from the "experts." That is not a healthy thing if you are one of those "experts." And this is a very, very subversive course.
I didn't know that, and it's disappointing if true. I thought D-Day was great reading too, and if he lifted parts of that I hope he at least had reliable sources to plagarize from.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.