Posted on 08/06/2002 7:42:18 AM PDT by kcpopps
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:12:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Three Pontiac men took the law -- and a blistering hot metal spatula -- into their hands when they learned a neighbor had been regularly sodomizing his 7- and 10-year-old nephews.
Two of the men held down the uncle while the third pressed the smoking spatula on his genitals, buttocks, stomach and legs. They paused only long enough to reheat the spatula on the kitchen stove for repeated branding before tossing the uncle out onto the sidewalk, breaking his arm.
(Excerpt) Read more at freep.com ...
In June 2001, Gibson, 38, pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct for the attacks on his nephews and was ordered to serve an 8- to 40-year prison term.
I think you've hit the target there. People are frustrated and losing faith in the system to punish the guilty
For the purpose of discussion, I respectfully disagree.
The very term "Vigilanteism" denotes a watchfulness againt evil, and an effort to stamp it out... to protect, if you will.
We live in a "Nation of Laws," but our "Justice" system is less concerned with justice as it is with law (in and of itself). Therefore, the whole reason for having laws has been subverted. Laws are established to protect the innocent, and avenge the victim... they should not be used to "protect" the law and shelter the guilty.
When government can not, or will not, or refuses, to protect the people; then the people have every right to protect themselves and the innocent.
The problem with the term "vigilante" is that we have been indoctrinated into thinking of it in a negative term. The word itself brings up visions of a "quick-judgement" based not on facts, but perceptions. IMHO we need to rethink the term in a better light. When properly used, vigilanteism can be a great deterent to those that would harm the innocent.
The aim is not really "justice" (whatever that may be), it is job security, pure and simple.
I vote against EVERY sitting judge at every election. Of course, in a lot of States, the lawyers have fixed it so that you don't get to vote on them. Too bad.
African Americans in the pre-civil rights South were sometimes victims of this on-the-spot "justice" by whites. It appears as if in both the Chicago and Pontiac cases, some blacks at the beginning of the 21st Century practice the same vigilantism by which their forbears were victimized in the early and mid 20th Century.
A tough version of Neighborhood Watch? :^)
Another member of the Club shoots his lying mouth off about the crumbling remnants of the American "justice" system.
We all know that Ken Frazee's family and associates are safe from criminality, because of the extreme penalties levied for messing with members of the Club. The rest of us are on our own.
I have no idea of race involved in this case. I'm not sure I would classify the Chicago case as vigilantism though. That seems to me more just a case of uncontrolled and unrestrained rage.
"I don't condone what the victim did," Frazee said, after Gibson's attackers were led away. "It was repulsive. But he was punished at the hands of these defendants -- tortured -- and the law does not allow for that."
But we're going to imprison these boys in a situation where they could get gang-raped in prison, and Ken Frazee's "law" DOES allow for that.
But that's not torture. No sirree.
It would have been much more discreet to simply make him disappear.
Well Kenny, if the justice system had not FAILED us, we would not have to resort to this. The justice system has failed, and our courts are unjust. Criminal walk free. More power to citizens who take the law into their own hands. I hope more citizens do likewise.
I guarantee that the scumbag that decides to molest my child will rue the day he was born on this earth. He will wish he had been allowed to die on death row.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.