Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
Skyrocketing housing prices have made it virtually impossible for most blacks to live in some communities, where even modest homes or apartments command huge prices.

The truly great Dr. Sowell blows it here, at least as far as the San Francisco peninsula goes. It IS a peninsula. There is only so much land. Many people want to live there because it is beautiful. Completely unrestricted landuse would only delay the advent of skyrocketing housing prices that would result whenever the last acre of space was built over.

In general, he is correct. but not for those few places that everybody would like to live if given the opportunity. By definition, the free market will drive prices in these places out of sight.

10 posted on 08/05/2002 10:15:47 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Restorer
The truly great Dr. Sowell blows it here, at least as far as the San Francisco peninsula goes. It IS a peninsula.

Have you ever compared the ratio of populated land to developable "open space" on the SF peninsula? There's plenty out there, even in the vicinity of San Jose. San Mateo County is barely populated. It's mostly poison oak. Housing prices here have never found an equilibrium that wasn't artificially maintained. If you own a house, even a hovel, it's a gravy train (as long as you can make the mortgage), so I'm not complaining.

12 posted on 08/05/2002 10:27:45 PM PDT by no-s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Restorer
"Completely unrestricted landuse would only delay the advent of skyrocketing housing prices that would result whenever the last acre of space was built over."

T'aint necessarily so. When you're done with building "out" you can build "up". And the choice is not between zero land planning and the current death-grip that planning has on development. A good start would be to return to a basic legal respect for the private-property rights of landowners, so that the full cost of zoning decisions is born by those benefiting from the regulation.

In the present case, California is looking at an annual housing deficit of (I think I recall correctly) something like 200,000 units per annum. Those people have to live somewhere, and the current approach to land use planning will result only in further polarization of land use and housing costs.

16 posted on 08/06/2002 7:31:53 AM PDT by absalom01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson