Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Jeeves
You seem to be making the analogy that the man who pays 59% of the total tax bill is getting 59% of the total government services.

No, it is impossible to make such an assessment. What I'm saying is that if the government did not exist, the 10th man would have only a minor fraction of what he has with the government. People who benefit the most should pay the most.

32 posted on 08/05/2002 10:02:39 AM PDT by Deuce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Deuce
What I'm saying is that if the government did not exist, the 10th man would have only a minor fraction of what he has with the government.

What if the government were 10% of its current size. How much would he have then?

The issue at hand is the rampant growth of government and the welfare state. Democrats always make the argument that without government the rich wouldn't be rich, but that is a false dichotomy. The argument isn't that government should be abolished - it's that it has grown far too large, consuming far too great a slice of the GDP.

42 posted on 08/05/2002 10:46:44 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson