This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war. |
Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
No, it's not a joke.
Bush renewed the Mexico City policy. Bush will sign a partial-birth abortion ban.
Reagan TALKED about a constitutional amendment, yes. He knew, and you know, that it will never happen.
oh, you do?
So then tell me:
1. Are children aborted for this research?
2. Did Bush approve aborting fetuses for this reasearch?
3. Are ANY fetuses harmed in the research President Bush allowed to remain??
4. Are ANY embryos harmed in the research President Bush allowed to remain? See if you can ctach that difference)
There are four VERY simple questoins since you already have the answers.
Looking forward to your reply. cheers.
So true. If you look back at the majority of Registered's post, they are very short remarks that are either attempting to be funny or personal fighting; very seldom any substance.
I had a feud with him some time back when during an argumentative exchange, he claimed that if I posted 10 things I had done to help elect Bush, he could name 50 that he had done.
Aside from being very ironic to think about in light of his Bush bashing of present, it was delightfully amusing.
I posted 10 and then asked him to post his 50. He squirmed for two days trying to avoid it. But following a little pressure after his boasting so strongly, he felt he had to post something.
I am not kidding when I tell you that he actually posted things such as:
1. Put bumper sticker on car
2. Put bumper sticker on wife's car
3. Put yard sign up
4. Argued with fellow workers in defense of Bush
5. Etc.
It was embarrassingly idiotic, but then I can't say I was really surprised.
Clintoon pandered to his core with gays in the military and Hillary-care among other issues. He was destroyed in 1994. You have to pander to independents in midterms. Clintoon did and was rewarded in 1998.
"ned" posted as different names for so long and took them to task. He had them agreeing and arguing with him at the same time.
How have they outted themselves, this band of intelligent conservatives?
They show they are not only easily led astray by some internet perosnality, "ned" (and other monickers) but they follow Keyes and Klayman as well, two people who are better at it than "ned", and this group of intellects STILL don't see it. The fact they brought this out in the open only embarasses themselves.
And what a lugher it was to have him banned over a link from their leaders website (Keyes - "Strike The root")
This is all too funny to say the least. What winners!
And what do you suggest? FReepers merely nod their head in approval when Dubya or ANY President for that matter engages in policies that we feel are detrimental to the Republic? This is a forum of which some of us hope our voices are being heard...
For starters, Dubya can start validating himself as a preserver of American sovereignty by truly enforcing the borders the way Eisenhower did it during 'Operation Wetback' -- search and deport illegal aliens. Is that so rash? Only is Dubya is thinking about Mexicans votes. Think he's not??
Then, for a change, he can stop caving in to the Democrats and Teddy on domestic fiscal issues like the 8 billion extra he donated to further socialist education; federalizing MORE government employees, and printing up money and sending it overseas as though it were monopoly money....etc.
I only hope the man doesn't bend like a wet noodle when it comes down to nominations of a conservative Supreme Court justice.
And this is "leadership"??
"He has asked that congress review Posse Comitatus Act to determine if troops can be used to patrol the borders, he has been accused of plotting a dictatorship."
Why is it we can spend billions of dollars here, there and everywhere around the world to protect "American interests", yet the President needs "permission" to kick illegal invaders out of the country? IMO, it's a stalling tactic -- wouldn't want to insult El Presidente Fox...
"Should I go on?"
Please do...
I got a big kick out of this one. Sort of shows how dangerously pro-abortion you are that you let these things slip. You want to abort a child? How late? 5-10-15 years old? If it helps your man, I am sure you will.
2. Did Bush approve aborting fetuses for this reasearch?
Actually, he did. It was on the front page of the Chicago Tribune a few weeks.
I don't understand your other questions, but I am sure it is meant to cloud the issue. What I do remember is that Bush opposed it during the election. He does not need us any longer until 2004. I will campaign very hard and long to make sure that this cancer in the White House is removed.
Oughta lock-up the Latino vote, eh?
Most of the personality cultists are one liner newbies with who have no idea what the hell they want or what their philosophy is. All they know is if their "team" promotes it they're it's a good idea, they just make up their idiot defense lines as they go along.
They don't argue whether this or that is good for America, all they do is compare hero-boy to everyone else. Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Hillary etc.
Every single conservative who dare speak ill of their figurehead/mascott get's put on the list of bad people with motives to be impuned.
That's why I call them all personality cultists, because all they know how to do is talk about people, rarely if ever ideas. The people they "root for" must win at all costs and the people they don't like must be beaten. Sort of like a giant Superbowl game, except our coutry is the gridiron and our lives are the football.
Stupid petty morons.
Most of the personality cultists are one liner newbies with who have no idea what the hell they want or what their philosophy is. All they know is if their "team" promotes it they're it's a good idea, they just make up their idiot defense lines as they go along.
They don't argue whether this or that is good for America, all they do is compare hero-boy to everyone else. Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Hillary etc.
Every single conservative who dare speak ill of their figurehead/mascott get's put on the list of bad people with motives to be impuned.
That's why I call them all personality cultists, because all they know how to do is talk about people, rarely if ever ideas. The people they "root for" must win at all costs and the people they don't like must be beaten. Sort of like a giant Superbowl game, except our coutry is the gridiron and our lives are the football.
Stupid petty morons.
i don't think registered is spreading disinformation on another forum. i saw where he posted "there is no excuse for what i did..." (admitting his error) and nothing further about the incident.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.