Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Flame war.



Skip to comments.

HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
The Cato Institute ^ | August 3, 2002 | By Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 921-932 next last
To: rintense
Here we go again...

LOL .. Good guess

201 posted on 08/04/2002 11:13:49 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: terilyn
Well I just did a quick glance of the thread .. and I think I'll go for the cold meds .. LOL
202 posted on 08/04/2002 11:15:37 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: kcpopps
You are a boor.

How about you butt out. This is between 2 dees and Luis.

203 posted on 08/04/2002 11:15:56 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: brat
I guess you missed all these...

Uncle Bill was posting evidence of Clinton corruption while you were defending him against impeachment. Just start another of your campaigns and get him banned the way you did Registered. Call Gramps in here and you two get to work. You'll have another old time FReeper banned and you can congratulate each other.
Liberals. Ya'll make me sick.

46 posted on 8/5/02 12:20 AM Eastern by Twodees
This site could lose the entire clique of Bushbots and survive. Losing all the old timers who carried the fight to the democrats while most of the W swoonfest posters here were voting democrat will kill this forum. Keep it up and there won't be an FR anymore.

60 posted on 8/5/02 12:33 AM Eastern by Twodees
You need to rest your keyboard, boy. It ain't as if you've ever had anything to say anyway. Sober up.

65 posted on 8/5/02 12:39 AM Eastern by Twodees

204 posted on 08/04/2002 11:17:02 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Got it ;)

And you can add yourself to the list of those that are making it "happen".

Thanks!
205 posted on 08/04/2002 11:17:25 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
Credibility? According to you I'm a liar anyway, though you don't know me.

All I needed to see was your claim that Howlin got Registered banned to label you as such. (Then again, maybe someone lied to you. I guess that's possible, too.)

Having seen the whole thing, I know that's not even close to being accurate...and if you came up with that on your own, you must be willing to take responsiblity for your dreadfully erroneous statement.

206 posted on 08/04/2002 11:17:43 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
That bad. Now Howlin supposedly "got Registered banned".

Ohhhhhhhhh .. so it's her fault he posted that stuff Huh???

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

207 posted on 08/04/2002 11:18:23 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Go for it, you've earned it LOL!
208 posted on 08/04/2002 11:19:49 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
"I'll FRmail you my address and you can come see for yourself..."

No need, I've known it for quite some time.

209 posted on 08/04/2002 11:20:24 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I don't think the President is going to lose any sleep over the Klan apologists' vote.
210 posted on 08/04/2002 11:22:01 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Not really. There is no regulation, or rule that dictates that he argue his position with every poster. Others do the same. No big deal to me.....

That is true if a person's only intent is to stir the hornets nest and is too cowardly to say why. I see that a lot around here.

211 posted on 08/04/2002 11:22:45 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Not to you just tagging on thelast post I think Bush is the Littlest Cowboy.

We need a Keyester type of man to stand up to the job. Next time.
212 posted on 08/04/2002 11:22:48 PM PDT by oceanperch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Ohhhhhhhhh .. so it's her fault he posted that stuff Huh???

Yeah. One of those, "You made me hit you!" things.

213 posted on 08/04/2002 11:24:01 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: terilyn
I guess I can call it preventive medicine ... LOL

214 posted on 08/04/2002 11:24:36 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
We need a Keyester type of man to stand up to the job. Next time.

Oh my gosh. Please do not tempt me with softball like that. Do the words Clymer and Keyester mean anything to you?

215 posted on 08/04/2002 11:25:37 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Well an article that starts with 'President Clinton was more conservative than President Bush' should be the first indication. 19 posted on 8/4/02 8:48 PM Pacific by rintense

A worth repeating bump RWP!

216 posted on 08/04/2002 11:26:22 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: terilyn
Thank you for a patient and civil reply. There are others on this thread who cannot do that.

I will agree that what Registered did crossed the line, even if the info was publically accessible. As someone else said, I wouldn't want my info posted.

But I was on that thread too and I saw the rudest behavior from the hardcore Bush supporters. Registered was pretty much dared to do it, IMO. Nevertheless, he should have restrained himself.

This thread is quickly turning into a name calling flame war, as most threads do that are even remotely critical of Bush.

Bush might be better than gore, but he shouldn't be above criticism and people shouldn't get vile personal attacks for expressing disagreement.

217 posted on 08/04/2002 11:26:39 PM PDT by kcpopps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; All
Twodees is a strict constitutionalist and you and your band are Republicans.

Your IGNORANCE of the difference is NO excuse for your behavior and personal attacks tonight.

Shameful. Does your cause, whatever that is, NO service.

218 posted on 08/04/2002 11:27:07 PM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
Oh your from LP, I get it now your an anti!
219 posted on 08/04/2002 11:28:00 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers; Twodees
2 Dees is a Southern Party secessionist that wants a new civil war. He has NO LOVE for the constitution. Don't pee in my ear and tell me it's raining.
220 posted on 08/04/2002 11:30:17 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 921-932 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson