I do not believe Jesus would have called people "whelps." In this case, Strong's definition makes no sense.
Well, that's true, unless the Hebrew definition of "whelp" is like ours (likely, since that's the English word chosen for translation):
1. A young offspring of a mammal, such as a dog or wolf.
2. a A child; a youth. b An impudent young fellow.
But the point was that the reference material didn't say "goy" meaning not descended from Noah through Shem. I figure that whatever else Strong's reference system is, it's been well researched by a lot of people and more than one linguist.