Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Terrell
Since the word "gentile" as used in the New Testament traces back to the word "whelp" in Hebrew and "nation" in Greek

I do not believe Jesus would have called people "whelps." In this case, Strong's definition makes no sense.

91 posted on 08/06/2002 1:55:33 PM PDT by Inyokern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Inyokern
In this case, Strong's definition makes no sense.

Well, that's true, unless the Hebrew definition of "whelp" is like ours (likely, since that's the English word chosen for translation):

1. A young offspring of a mammal, such as a dog or wolf.
2. a A child; a youth. b An impudent young fellow.

But the point was that the reference material didn't say "goy" meaning not descended from Noah through Shem. I figure that whatever else Strong's reference system is, it's been well researched by a lot of people and more than one linguist.

96 posted on 08/06/2002 7:45:31 PM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson