Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Inyokern
I get the picture:

Strong's definition makes no sense (Strongs Concordance)

Lost Tribe doesn't know what he is talking about.

Placing the designation of "Jew" ... after the Babylonian captivity ... is completely arbritrary

You're the kind of guy who has to play marbles alone because you change the rules in the middle of the game to suit where your marbles lay.  Bet you even have trouble with the definition of IS.

Forgettaboutit!

100 posted on 08/07/2002 7:08:16 AM PDT by PaulKersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: PaulKersey
I get the picture: Strong's definition makes no sense (Strongs Concordance)

Using the definition "whelp" for gentile makes no sense. I did not say Strong's Condordance makes no sense in every case. Do not misrepresent what I said.

Lost Tribe doesn't know what he is talking about.

Yes, I think that is self-evident.

Placing the designation of "Jew" ... after the Babylonian captivity ... is completely arbritrary

Yes, it is arbitrary, since the English language did not even exist in those times and the original (Hebrew) language makes no such distinction.

101 posted on 08/07/2002 9:20:21 AM PDT by Inyokern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson