Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 07055; Brian Mosely; JZoback
Time: But Berger and the principals decided to shelve the plan and let the next administration take it up. With less than a month left in office, they did not think it appropriate to launch a major initiative against Osama bin Laden.

07055: "Of course not. During its last month, the Clinton administration was too busy selling pardons and issuing executive orders to focus on terrorism."

Time: That made it politically impossible for Clinton to strike—especially given the upcoming election and his own lack of credibility on national security.

Right 07055, lack of credibility on any subject!

36 posted on 08/04/2002 8:47:09 AM PDT by c-five
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: c-five
Source: Jewish World Review

Dick Morris:

Clinton was removed, uninvolved, and distant where the war on terror was concerned. CIA director Woolsey now reveals that he never had a private personal meeting with Clinton during the first two years of his tenure as head of the CIA - exactly the key period in investigating the 1993 attack.

I had a good illustration of Clinton's remoteness from terrorist issues in 1996 when Dick Holbrooke called me, several months after the terrorist attack on US barracks in Ridyah, Saudi Arabia. Holbrooke, who told me that he had never had the opportunity to speak with Clinton directly during the months that he was negotiating the Dayton peace accords in Bosnia, asked that I get hold of the president to pass along a message. Holbrooke said that he had information that the terrorists were planning another attack in Ridyah and that our troops were highly vulnerable

Ah...the Times!!! Nice try.
71 posted on 08/05/2002 7:30:35 AM PDT by Toidylop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson