Let me ask you to state a position, so I can be clear on where you stand. The question is with respect to the White House's confirmation this week to the Los Angeles Times that 9-11 operational commander Mohammed Atta flew to Prague last year to meet with an agent of the Iraqi government. Here are three mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive possibilities. Tell me which you favor:
To understand the anthrax story, you need to understand the Prague story. To understand the Prague story, you need to understand the anthrax story. Until you understand both, you are truly clueless as to the real nature of Bush's War on Terrorism.
It has long been known that Saddam Hussein has WMD and uses them as a deterrent (blackmail) against attack. It has long been known that the U.S. is unprepared for a biological attack. A regime change in Iraq, possibly by force, is the stated policy of the Bush Administration, which raises the risk of an attack using WMD i.e. the Samson syndrome. It is self-evident that the possibility of a final war with Saddam Hussein requires time and preparation.
There is no need for the deliberate and elaborate conspiracy in the anthrax investigation, with which you seem to be obsessed. In fact, in terms of credibility it is counter-productive.