Replies

Yeah, that's the first thing a sane person is going to wonder when they read this article. Sure.

Not the first thing, but one of several things.

Someone's got a great chance for winning a lawsuit against the FBI for planting the idea to go out and rape a child in their head.

No, probably not. But the kid who gets raped would probably wish they had just shut the server down and bust everyone in the database.

I remember years ago on some daytime talk show a porn woman trying to persuade housewives that porn is a good thing for their husbands. "He watches my videos and I get him horney, then YOU get the sex!"

So he watches the site and the FBI gets him horny, then the KIDS get raped! Is that really too complicated?

The reason child porn is illegal is because IT INCITES CHILD RAPE, and children who were victimized to produce it continue to be victimized when it is distributed! The FBI is in the business of victimizing children and INCITING CHILD RAPE ALL OVER THE WORLD!

7000+ in England alone! And the site was American! How much $$$ per month did the FBI make doing this?

You're assuming that none of the thousands of viewers of the FBI's porn site had access to any other child porn, had ever molested a child before or might have been contemplating the molestation of children in the future.

This FBI sting is going to do alot of good and, except in your wild imagination, no harm at all.

If the proper authorities, in all of these countries, bust these viewers, search their homes and interview children they might have come in contact with, a great service will have been done to the world community.

How many of these perverts will have tapes and still pictures made by monsters like Robles Perez?

Track those back to the source and alot of children might be saved.

By working this site a little longer, the FBI might have caught the next Avilla or Robles Perez.

Read Valpal1's post #54. Valpal1 is correct. These were not the FBI's websites. They belonged to others that were arrested.

There's not one bit of inference in the article that the FBI left the sites open one moment more than it took them to bust down the doors.