Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I found this while a- googling:

It won’t be long, historically speaking, before spectrum auctions may become technologically obsolete, economically inefficient, and legally unconstitutional.

And it may not be long before a new form of frequency allocation may emerge where spectrum use does not require any license; when information traverses the ether as flexibly as an airplane in the sky instead of being straight-jacketed into a single frequency and routed like a train on a track; and where congestion is avoided not by the exclusivity of ownership but by access charges that vary with congestion, with the information itself often paying for access with tokens it carries along.

source

41 posted on 08/07/2002 11:32:30 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: secretagent
"We Don't Want Our DTV" is an editorial page signed opinion in The Wall Street Journal today.

Sounds like TV is sitting on 402 MHz of unused bandwidth, trying to keep wireless out of it more or less like the dog in the manger.

I think the FCC is seriously out of whack. When you seriously reflect on what broadcast does to our culture . . . we-the-people can make good use of two-way wireless, but have no need of 402 MHz of additional read-only claptrap.

42 posted on 08/08/2002 6:10:41 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson