Just to be clear, I ping AM here because it was AM's post to begin with.
As someone who was part of many of the "flame wars" the poster in question was involved with, I'm very aware that the "flame wars" in question were going on well before the arrival of this poster. Perhaps I'm confused, but I thought they actually calmed a bit after the arrival of the poster in question.
As to the mocking of Registered, it appeared to me to be a reaction to Registered mocking the poster in question and others--up to and including the behavior that earned Registered his recent suspension.
My opinion, for what it's worth.
Registered has mocked me (and others) mercilessly - creating graphics to insult me, among other things. It's extremely difficult for me to see him as a victim (and clearly, he is the one who complained to the A/M). I am more than a little surprised that someone having "a thing for mocking Registered" would get someone accused of being an anarchist.
But if you read the moderator's comments: "...we discovered someone who had at least 8 different accounts. One bashed Horowitz, Swaggert, and Art Bell. Another bashed Keyes. Another posted as a rabid Keyester. Another posted as a Klayman basher. Several seemed to have a thing for mocking Registered."
It sounds like this person what posting simply to disrupt...No? Sounds like the moderators monitored these various accts to discover the dichotomy of the posts?
What I am saying is that the flame wars are providing cover for, and are enabling, people who wish to divide and conquer the conservative movement.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Thanks, AM