I'm not an outlaw. I just do not accept a man-made law against possessing a god-given, natural plant of ANY kind. Man-made drugs, on the other hand, should remain illegal. There should be a distinction between the two.
Todays pot has been so high-breed that it is not normal. It is basically man made. Same thing with hard alcohol of today, it has been distilled to such strenghth that it is no where where Biblical days.
SunStar: I just do not accept a man-made law against possessing a god-given, natural plant of ANY kind. Man-made drugs, on the other hand, should remain illegal. There should be a distinction between the two.
Lowelljr: Todays pot has been so high-breed that it is not normal. It is basically man made. Same thing with hard alcohol of today, it has been distilled to such strenghth that it is no where where Biblical days.
"If drugs make you stupid what does that say about someone who declares war on them, inanimate objects that they are, and is losing?" Utterly losing, I might add.
I've read your posts on this thread and have to wonder why you think any inanimate object that by nature has no power of its own to harm any person should be illegal. I mean, there's a long list of inanimate objects than a person can pick up and use to harm themselves and or other people. Guns are inanimate objects that never harmed anyone. Last century a hundred-million people were killed by people with guns. Governments alone killed sixty million of their own citizens. Guns don't kill -- people kill. Should people be illegal? Putting aside natural disasters and having out-competed animals, people are by far the biggest potential danger to themselves and other people.
When we focus on identifying which group of people in general does the most harm to other people and society then we can look closer to identify the specific criminals. That has been done and the conclusion is that upper-tier politicians and bureaucrats are the most destructive people. That's true in United States and all other countries.