And my original point was that it doesn't add
anything to the discussion, except, of course, if the purpose of the analysis was to provide another method of minimizing or discrediting the objects of the others on this thread.
So either it is worthless, or an attack on the others' interpretation of events.
Of course, there is an easy way to resolve this. Simple address a message to him/her and ask him why he brought up the point. You won't do that, because you know the purpose of it as well as I do...
You really think I would have bothered engaging in (what has turned out to be this pointless) discussion with you if I thought that was his intent? No. In fact, I pinged him to my first response to you. But I do think you & I have gone as far as we can go trying to ascertain the motives of a third person. I'll stop now, content in the knowledge that I've managed to get attacked by both sides in this debate -- which I think is maybe a first for me. In any event, I made my views known on post #72 & I'll stick with them. Good night.