Sorry, I just don't agree with your underlying premise. As I said before, this is a
discussion forum, not a debating society. I don't view the requirements of acceptable discussion as being as limited as you obviously do. You of course have every right to your view, as do I.
I just thought it was presumptuous of you to try and speak for "everyone."
Just as I thought it was presumptuous of the original poster to psychoanalyze and assign motives to the other members of this thread (in order to discredit their argument). But we can overlook the presumptuousness that we agree with, can't we...?