Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pettifogger
At the risk of a little pop-psych thinking, I strongly suspect that the "blame the parents" crowd, on this and similar threads, make their comments as a way of assuring themselves that THEIR kids (grandkids, nieces, nephews, whatever) would never find themselves in this situation. It's in large part a defensive reaction to horrific news -- a way to reassure yourself that you and yours are not in danger.

You know the problem with pop-psychology? It's a two-edged sword. Someone could say (with just as much evidence and legitimacy as your original "analysis") that the "let teenagers be teenagers" crowd are making their statements to unconsciously reassure themselves that whatever bad actions or experiences their own children engaged in does not reflect on their parenting or moral duties. They could be attempting to rationalize their own feelings of parental failure and their secret, guilty feelings that they did not do "enough" to prevent their own children from straying.

Which is why pop-psychology is garbage. Do everyone a favor, and avoid that kind of psuedo-scientific BS. Analyzing and arguing from someone else's motives (rather than their arguments) is a logical fallacy, and not productive. If you think the linking of these childrens' situation and the parents' responsibilities is in error, then attack that (and there's a lot to attack). But attacking the "motive" of the arguers (ad hominem) is a sign of intellectual weakness, not strength.

If I wanted emotional reaction and fallacious argument, I'd read DU. We all expect better from Free Republic...

171 posted on 08/04/2002 9:31:22 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Charles H. (The_r0nin); pettifogger
Please don't try speaking for "everone" here. I, and others appreciated his response. If you look at what pettifogger said, you'd see that he was not "attacking the 'motive' of the arguers (ad hominem)" He was stating his perception of where their analysis of the situation might be were coming from. I agreed with him because I knew it was a large part of my own reaction to the situation.
172 posted on 08/04/2002 1:31:51 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin); Amore
. . . Do everyone a favor, and avoid that kind of psuedo-scientific BS. . . .

Thanks for your opinion. I stand by mine.

183 posted on 08/05/2002 6:49:17 AM PDT by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson