[Jeff Head]

I gave my last reply to Mr. Non-Safety Inventor in post number 539 when it became apparent that from my perspective he was not interested in listening to candid responses to his assertions, was not interested in a "better" way, and has his own agenda.

Many many well respected KABA adovocates have tried to share with him the real solution of education and training, while explaining in great detail the danger of his particular invention. He is not interested in hearing it or realistically trying to address or refute it those explainations.

I know of no one, who is serious about their firearms and applying them as they were intended, who wants anyone to think their firearms are "safe". They are not safe, they were not intended to be. Having people think they are safe, or can be safe will just get people injured or killed.

Sort of like thinking Red China is safe. Perhaps not the best analogy ... but it allowed me to make a plug for the book series just the same. LOL! FRegards.

[gc4nra]

I knew you would have a great perspective, as usual.As I stated in my previous post, this is purely for profit.

Profit in and of itself is not bad, as long as the product
isn't going to get any one killed.

How's the book doing. Hope to have autographed copies of the whole series someday!