Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Stunned' US tells Putin its nuclear fear of Iran
The Times (U.K.) ^ | 08/02/2002 | Robin Shepherd

Posted on 08/01/2002 4:53:18 PM PDT by Pokey78

AMERICA and Russia clashed yesterday over new Russian plans to build five more nuclear reactors in Iran, which Washington claims will be used by the Islamic republic to develop nuclear weapons.

Spencer Abraham, the US Energy Secretary, speaking on an official visit to Moscow, said that America’s objections had been raised at the “highest levels”, indicating that President Bush had taken the matter directly to the Kremlin.

Until yesterday’s comments from Mr Abraham, top US officials had been silent on the plans, which were quietly announced on the Russian Government’s official website last week. Diplomatic sources say that the US had probably been too stunned to comment.

Mr Abraham, however, indicated that behind the scenes a full-scale row was now taking place. “No one should be under any impression that we treat this as anything except of the utmost concern and those concerns have been frankly directed during our meetings here. We are in the middle of sensitive discussions on this matter,” he said.

Mr Bush accuses Iran of sponsoring terrorism and earlier this year listed Iran with Iraq and North Korea as members of an “axis of evil” that threatened US national security. In May, he warned Moscow that its project to build a nuclear reactor at the Bushehr facility on the Gulf coast would be used by the Iranians to develop weapons of mass destruction; the Russians and Iranians refuted the claim.

The new plans envisage three more reactors at the Bushehr site and another two at a new power station at Akhvaz, about 65 miles from the Iraqi border.

The new plans for expanded nuclear co-operation with Iran have soured the atmosphere, between the two states, the more so because the US thought it had received assurances that Russia’s nuclear relationship with Iran was coming to an end. Earlier in the year, Russia’s Atomic Energy Minister said that nuclear co-operation with Iran would probably conclude with the Bushehr project and as recently as July 9, Colin Powell, the US Secretary of State, said that the US and Russia were making progress on the Iran-Russia nuclear issue.

American fears have been seconded by Israel, which in 1981 sent bombers to destroy a nuclear reactor near Baghdad. Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel, predicted recently that Iran would be a nuclear power by 2005. A commentary in Tuesday’s Tehran Times said that Iran would retaliate against any attack on its civil nuclear facilities.

Russian and Iranian officials are to sign off on the plans at a meeting in Iran in September.

Mr Abraham said that the Bush Administration was in no doubt that Iran’s real purpose in expanding its civil nuclear capabilities was to procure technology for nuclear weapons, particularly since Iran’s vast natural energy reserves vitiated the need for nuclear power stations.

“We’ve long been concerned that Iran’s only interest in nuclear civil power given its vast mass of domestic energy resources is to support its nuclear weapons programme. For that reason we have consistently urged Russia to cease all nuclear co-operation with Iran including its assistance to the reactor in Bushehr.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; waronterror

1 posted on 08/01/2002 4:53:18 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Well this could get interesting...
2 posted on 08/01/2002 4:56:55 PM PDT by Damocles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Damocles
Well this could get interesting...

This could get ugly.

3 posted on 08/01/2002 5:04:02 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eala
This could get ugly.

At many levels. The nuclear waste is perfect for "dirty nukes".
4 posted on 08/01/2002 5:06:14 PM PDT by BJClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Iran is one of the evil ones!
5 posted on 08/01/2002 5:13:43 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
And perhaps we should share our most advanced ABM technologies with the Israelis. Who knows, maybe an ABM alliance, lasers and hit to kill interceptors armed with super clean low yield nukes, (just to be sure).
6 posted on 08/01/2002 5:18:54 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
In many ways, Iran is the mother of all evil ones.
7 posted on 08/01/2002 5:19:08 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
bump
8 posted on 08/01/2002 5:26:40 PM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"Diplomatic sources say that the US had probably been too stunned to comment."

Naive, gullible American officialdom actually trusted the Russians to take American interests to heart. It seems they have to learn the hard way that Russia cannot to be trusted. Russia has always had ambitions for world power and influence and they show no inclination to change that. The first place they start is Central Asia -- their own back yard.

9 posted on 08/01/2002 5:32:48 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
How does anyone make sense on this thread? Don't they read it in Russia, China, etc., etc.
10 posted on 08/01/2002 5:45:51 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
Actually, Russia is probaly selling this stuff to Iran for a buttload of cash, thereby looking after their national interests, same as we do. Doesn't mean its a good thing though.
11 posted on 08/01/2002 6:02:01 PM PDT by FreeperinRATcage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
Great take, there. So, what is Russia betting on to keep the power plants up?
12 posted on 08/01/2002 6:14:24 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Iran has almost an limitless supply of natural gas.

For anyone to say the plants are only for generating power is ludicrous.
13 posted on 08/01/2002 6:17:55 PM PDT by Guillermo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Well, why don't we engage in talks with the Chechnyans to sell them nuclear reactors?
14 posted on 08/01/2002 6:25:20 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apochromat
What do they care, after they have the cash? Heck...if the IDF comes in and blows em, the Russia can sell MORE of them, for MORE cash.

I don't think there's much of a way Russia is going to play power politics on this..is strictly a cash deal.

15 posted on 08/02/2002 4:57:24 PM PDT by FreeperinRATcage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson