Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious Shift in Earth's Gravity Suggests Equator is Bulging
space.com ^ | 1 Aug 02 | Robert Roy Britt

Posted on 08/01/2002 3:13:16 PM PDT by RightWhale

Mysterious Shift in Earth's Gravity Suggests Equator is Bulging

By Robert Roy Britt Senior Science Writer

posted: 02:00 pm ET 01 August 2002

Something strange has been going on under our feet for the past four years. Earth's gravity field suddenly shifted gears and began getting flatter, reversing a course of centuries during which the planet and its gravity field grew rounder each year.

The scientists who noticed the change and report it in the Aug. 2 issue of the journal Science suspect Earth itself may be flattening out, with the oceans rising near the equator, but they aren't sure.

What they do know is that Earth has never been round. It has always bulged at the equator and is about 0.3 percent fatter there, partly a result of the planet's rotation.

Getting rounder

Yet ever since the last Ice Age, the planet has been getting rounder as ground beneath the polar regions, relieved of the weight from ice that was miles thick in places, has been rebounding. In some parts of Scandinavia and Canada, the ground rises a quarter-inch (1 centimeter) per year.

Since the late 1970s, satellite measurements have shown that this post-glacial rebound, as it is called, generates a corresponding rounding of Earth's gravity field.

Suddenly the trend has reversed.

"Sometime around 1998, something began to make the Earth's gravity field flatter," says Christopher Cox of Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services. "The result is it looks as if post-glacial rebound has reversed itself. But, we do not have any reason to think that post-glacial rebound has in any way stopped or changed."

In effect, Cox said in an interview, while post-glacial rebound continues to make the Earth rounder, some movement of mass on the surface of the Earth must be making the gravity field flatter. It's not a change anyone could notice; it's only revealed by sensitive satellite measurements.

The shift, however, is significant.

"The effect is twice as large as post-glacial rebound in terms of effect on the gravity field, and it's in the opposite direction," Cox said. "Whatever it is, it's big."

Like a rubber ball

Cox, who also works at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, described post-glacial rebound as similar to pushing a rubber ball in at the top and bottom with your fingers. "The sides come out, and the top and bottom go in. Take your fingers off that rubber ball, and the sides are going to go in and the top is going to come out again."

What does this have to do with Earth?

"You have material moving inside," Cox explained. The rubber is compressed, but air is also pushed around. Some of the post-glacial rebound is caused by the ground simply decompressing. But scientists have long known that to account for what they've measured, Earth's physical shape must change. Material --ground, water or air -- must be moved around. Though the planet's shape and its gravity field are not directly correlated, they are related.

Cox and his colleague, Benjamin Chao of Goddard, were at first baffled by the sudden reversal and flattening of the gravity field. They considered that ice melting at the poles and raising the overall sea level could be the culprit. Calculations showed, however, that "you would have to drop a 10x10x5 kilometer cube of it into the ocean every year for the past five years." Separate measurements of sea surface height from NASA's TOPEX/Poseidon mission don't support this scenario.

Material in Earth's crust can't be responsible -- it couldn't move so quickly from the poles to the equator. Molten rock oozing around in Earth's core might be to blame, but data do not support such a scenario. Changes in the atmosphere might be involved, but no data supports that being the primary cause, either.

So what is it?

Instead, Cox said, long-term circulation patterns in the ocean seem to be the most likely cause.

Shifts in huge ocean currents -- similar to El Nino but on larger scales and moving in a north-south direction -- might transport enough water toward the equator to account for the flattened gravity field. One such cycle is called the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.

"We have a strong suspicion that it's in the ocean," Cox said.

"Whatever the cause, the results of Cox and Chao emphasize the importance of gravity variations as a barometer of integrated mass changes in the Earth system," write scientists Anny Cazenave and R. Steven Nerem in an analysis of the research for Science. "Monitoring these variations with improved spatial and temporal resolution would provide an important tool for studying Earth system changes."

Since Cox and Chao submitted their paper to the journal, they've continued to look into the mystery and are more confident that the ocean is behind it all. "But we need more data," Cox said.

That data could come from NASA's GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) satellite mission, which will provide the most precise measurements ever made of Earth's gravity field. GRACE launched in March.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: flatearth; globalwarming; gravity; isostaticrebound; potsdamgravitypotato
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: dirtboy
Actually it's not the beer that gives you that pot belly. It's the food that goes with the beer that piles the weight on. (I'm in the same boat myself.) I don't know if I can eat less, there are so many foods that go well with beer!
21 posted on 08/01/2002 3:30:23 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Actually it's not the beer that gives you that pot belly. It's the food that goes with the beer that piles the weight on. (I'm in the same boat myself.) I don't know if I can eat less, there are so many foods that go well with beer!
22 posted on 08/01/2002 3:30:26 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
As far as GPS is concerned, they have picked a limited selection of spheroids and insist you use them.

I'm talking more about the broadcast message and how it's built.

The message is constructed by a series of least squares fits over a long-term prediction of the satellite trajectory. If the gravity model is significantly flawed the prediction may be off by meters per day.

In real life, some of is mitigated by the operators, who keep an eye on the accuracy of the broadcast message; however, it increases workloads, and if there are any delays in sending new orbit information to the satellites, the world will see additional errors in their solution.

Not too big a deal for most, but probably rather upsetting for a GPS-guided bomb.

23 posted on 08/01/2002 3:31:00 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Try going to single portions.
24 posted on 08/01/2002 3:31:17 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Must be due to all those discarded half eaten Big Macs!
25 posted on 08/01/2002 3:31:35 PM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Who's the earth gonna sue for its bulging equator?
26 posted on 08/01/2002 3:32:53 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
And is there a plus-size theory of plate tectonics?
27 posted on 08/01/2002 3:33:51 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
They will miss your bunker by 420.04 feet. Those who are typing in coordinates for Saddam's cubicle are probably going slowly mad with the constant and variable shifts in random directions as the earth's gravity field meanders.

Don't make unwarranted assumptions. Selective availability has been turned off, and the guided bombs never had to contend with it anyway. You can ask the cave-dwelling Talibunnies whether those bombs missed by 430 feet...

28 posted on 08/01/2002 3:34:18 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Capitalism is to blame. The exploitive nations of the northern hemisphere have stolen so much of the raw material from the equatorial zone that the reduction in surface mass is causing underlying layers to bulge towards the surface.

Or it could be the cell phones.
29 posted on 08/01/2002 3:34:31 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Each satellite in the GPS constellation has to be updated constantly. Whether it is every day I don't know, but if they start drifting the receivers will just follow. I assume they are updated every time there would be enough error to measure. For differential stations, that would be of the order of a foot.
30 posted on 08/01/2002 3:34:59 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Resembles Gore, doesnt it?

Nah. No sweat rings.

31 posted on 08/01/2002 3:35:06 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dead
The polar weight loss due to glacial melting has been offset by the gradual move away from the equator of Hillary Clinton.

Couldn't agree more! The changed ocean flow isn't from washing old crusty.

32 posted on 08/01/2002 3:36:21 PM PDT by leadhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The satellites are updated whenever the error reaches a certain value, unless for some reason they cannot get an upload into the satellite. Standard is at least once a day, and often more.
33 posted on 08/01/2002 3:36:41 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
My law partners would say it's the fault of the evil Republicans.
34 posted on 08/01/2002 3:36:41 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

35 posted on 08/01/2002 3:36:49 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Tora Bora is practically equatorial. South of Europe and New York, anyway. Down there, the earth is rounder, or used to be until this article. There has always been a question of accuracy for over-the-Pole ICBM shots, too.
36 posted on 08/01/2002 3:39:05 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: decimon
My Mama says it's cause hell has enlarged itself, quotes the Bible. :)
37 posted on 08/01/2002 3:40:31 PM PDT by Wingsofgold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Extra ketchup, please.
38 posted on 08/01/2002 3:40:42 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
This report is pretty stupid. The idea that the glaciers and oceanic weight would affect the shape of the planet is pretty stupid. This would be like saying that the first layer of skin on an onion can affect the shape of the onion.
39 posted on 08/01/2002 3:41:13 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

40 posted on 08/01/2002 3:42:39 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson