Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: one_particular_harbour; SJackson
author can wax poetic about long term, but when you invest in a company that goes bankrupt, there is no long term to consider

Right. If you buy 30 stocks and hold them for 30 years, some of them will go bankrupt. However, that does not happen for the S&P 500 because S&P boots stocks out of the S&P 500 when they are tanking. Therefore, using the S&P 500 as an indicator of long-term performance is wrong due to selection bias.

25 posted on 08/01/2002 11:44:15 AM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Rodney King; one_particular_harbour
Although I prefer the Dow to the S&P, they replace issues periodically as well. I didn't really take the article too seriously (or the book). About the same time John Templeton was asked how high the Dow would go, he stated definitively 100,000. To the followup question, when, in the next century.
27 posted on 08/01/2002 12:16:29 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson