[LeGrande]

> They are responsible for their actions until they die
> from alcohol poisoning.

> Open your mind and consider this - if you intentionally > set out to get someone drunk, see them sit behind
> the wheel of a car, give them the keys, watch them
> start the car and drive away while learning later that
> the driver killed someone else - are you not
> somewhat responsible for the death of the dead?

Being drunk does not in anyway relieve anyones responsibility for their actions.

Now if you forced the person to drink and forced them to drive then you would be more than partially responsible but short of using force you wouldn't.

How old are you?

Interesting how a libloather doesn't want to take responsibility for his actions. I thought that was the major definition of the libs they don't want to take responsibility for their actions. They had a bad childhood, they were molested, they were drunk, they were on drugs, they lived in a depressed area, their sexual desires controlled them, and on and on. If someone using free will does something they are responsible.

[Libloather]

Being drunk does not in anyway relieve anyones responsibility for their actions.

Even if they're 16 or 17 years old - and placed behind the wheel of a car after consuming a case of beer?