To: elfman2
Every now and then every new service has some questionable info. Worldnetdaily has much more fact than fiction, as compared to CNN, ABC, NBC, Etc. they like to use exclusion.
Mostly excluding the facts.
Worldnetdaily has the best track record I have found to
date.
Ops4 God Bless America!!!
22 posted on
07/31/2002 12:19:17 PM PDT by
OPS4
To: OPS4
"Every now and then every new service has some questionable info. " Okay then, "frequently". I was being kind. And judging from the moderators removal of this "Breaking News" from the list, your opinion's in the minority.
23 posted on
07/31/2002 12:21:41 PM PDT by
elfman2
To: OPS4
I consider WorldNetDaily a credible source - Insight Magazine as well. Check out this article that recently appeared in Insight entitled "Clinton Ignored Iraqi Links to Oklahoma City". The article makes perfect sense and may have lead many a sheeple into voting for Clinton the second time around.
http://insightmag.com/main.cfm?include=detail&storyid=258777
One thing to consider though, just because Ari or the White House aren't talking about this to the press doesn't necessarily mean they aren't looking into it. They may not want to scare the cockroaches still here back into the woodwork.
29 posted on
07/31/2002 12:31:11 PM PDT by
Quilla
To: OPS4
Has it occurred to anyone that this possibility has been followed up on? And that if it has lead anywhere that we might be watching the bad actors covertly?
30 posted on
07/31/2002 12:34:46 PM PDT by
LisaFab
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson