To: VA Advogado; Roscoe
"Libertarianism without falsehoods would be silence." -roscoelies-
I suppose if they lie enough about the constitution, it really will contain a statement pointing to why drugs should be legal
Whatta couple-a dopes.
-- 'Drugs' are, and always have been legal under the constitution. In 1914 an unconstitutional legislative 'act' was passed, prohibiting some drugs.
251 posted on
08/04/2002 11:58:37 AM PDT by
tpaine
To: tpaine
In 1914 an unconstitutional legislative 'act' was passed, prohibiting some drugs. Georgia had a prohibition edict in place in 1733. The Oregon Territory had prohibition in 1843. Maine had a prohibition law in 1846. In the 19th century, New Hampshire, Vermont and Michigan, among others, had prohibition laws on the books.
Libertarianism without falsehoods would be silence.
253 posted on
08/04/2002 12:22:48 PM PDT by
Roscoe
To: tpaine
In 1914 an unconstitutional legislative 'act' was passed, prohibiting some drugs.
Can you share with the audience which judge or even which court has declared that 1914 act unconstitutional? You libertines like to cite all the provision of the constutition except the one where it says the supreme court is the ultimate arbitrator of what is unconstitutional.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson