Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Serbia: Serbs Leaving Sandzak
IWPR ^ | 26 July 02 | IWPR Staff

Posted on 07/30/2002 10:52:50 AM PDT by Dragonfly

Serbia: Serbs Leaving Sandzak

Departure of Serbs from Sandzak believed to be triggered by policies of Bosniak nationalists

By IWPR staff in London (BCR No 353, 26-Jul-02)

Serbs are beginning to leave the predominantly Muslim Sandzak region of south-west Serbia after losing public sector jobs, local Serb representatives say.

Some Serbs estimate that around 1,000 members of the community in the largest town in the region, Novi Pazar, have left over the last couple of years. New For Sale signs appear on Serb homes and land throughout the region almost daily.

More departures could have serious implications for the stability of the country, with some predicting a possible nationalist Serb backlash.

The exodus is believed to have been prompted by the predominantly Muslim Party of Democratic Action, SDA, which has dismissed Serb managers in state companies and local authorities since coming to power two years ago.

Federal Minister for National and Ethnic Communities Rasim Ljajic, who leads the moderate Bosniak Coalition for Sandzak, told IWPR that "the reasons for Serb departures are economic but one certainly shouldn't overlook other reasons linked to the actions of the SDA."

Head of the Serbian Radical Party, SRS, municipal committee Milan Veselinovic is more blunt, "The extremist statements and actions of the SDA have resulted in a situation in which over 70 Serb houses in the very centre of Novi Pazar have been sold in the past two years. There the Serb proportion of the population has dropped from 22 to around 17 per cent. "

The SDA led by Sulejman Ugljanin has long called for Sandzak to be made a republic and in the past prominent party members have also talked of secession from Serbia and annexation to Bosnia.

Widely-publicised statements made by Ugljanin in the 1990s include "the Muslims are well-armed, they just lack tanks" (Globus, October 1992) and "Sandzak would become a new, Muslim autonomous region in Serbia that will even secede" (Novosti, November 1990).

This was a period when convoys of Bosniaks - which is how local Muslims describe themselves - were fleeing Sandzak for Sarajevo or Turkey, fearing that the war in neighbouring Bosnia would spread and they would be targeted by the Milosevic regime.

However, while there is no longer public talk of a republic, Milosevic's fall in 2000 and a general change in Belgrade's policy direction does not appear to have done much to alter SDA thinking.

In June this year, a public statement from a session of the regional executive body the Bosniak National Council of Sandzak, which has close links with the SDA, said, "There are no reasons for us to ingratiate ourselves either to Belgrade or Podgorica, or the international community because Sandzak must be a separate territorial unit".

Participants at the session also declared that they must not give up on an illegal referendum held in 1991, in which a clear majority voted for autonomy.

Serb directors in Novi Pazar to lose their jobs include the head of the town's culture centre Dusan Raicevic; Raco Vuckovic of the Toplane heating company; Elektroras director Mile Cvetic; and Miroljub Djokanovic, director of the firm, Vojin Popovic.

In turn, appointments to local government at the end of 2000 saw Ugljanin's personal secretary Vasvija Gusinac become mayor of Sandzak, his brother, Sadik, head of the executive committee and driver, Nedzib Hodzic, deputy major.

The only Serb in authority, municipal secretary Milijan Belic "is just for decor and the local Serbs do not recognise him as their representative," said Radenko Jokovic, head of the United Peoples Party, SNS, in the Raska district.

Like Ljajic, the head of the Liberal Bosniak Organisation, Kasim Zoranic, said the major motivation behind the Serb withdrawal was economic, "The price of real-estate in Novi Pazar is three times higher than that in other parts of Serbia."

An apartment in Novi Pazar costs approximately 750 euros per square metre compared with 400 euros in the central Serbian cities of Kraljevo and Kragujevac. A Serb who had shifted from Novi Pazar to Kragujevac, and who insisted on anonymity, agreed that there was a range of motives for Serb departures.

"There was always some tension felt at work. There was no open pressure but one could feel insecurity and some kind of fear in the air. Maybe more a feeling of uncertainty of what could happen and what the Novi Pazar authorities could do," he said.

"On the other hand the difference in the price of a flat sold in Novi Pazar and one bought in Kragujevac is quite alluring especially for those who are in a difficult financial situation."

Whatever lies behind the Serb departures, SDA-ruled local authorities are showing no interest.

Assistant to the head of the Novi Pazar municipal executive committee Kimeta Ramovic recently told a Sandzak news agency that they had neither information nor any comment on the migration.

That local Serbs have lost the backing they enjoyed during Milosevic's rule has been made clear by the fact that the current Serbian leadership has not held a single meeting with them since they came to power.

Such complacency is astonishing as there's a danger that if more Serbs leave Sandzak, Bosniak nationalists could press for their demands for autonomy provoking another Balkan crisis.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: balkans; campaignfinance; milosevic; serbia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
More trouble in the Balkans. Will NATO come to the rescue again?
1 posted on 07/30/2002 10:52:51 AM PDT by Dragonfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
Looks like a repeat of Kosovo....

Serbs leaving like in Kosovo in the 40's, 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's ....

Deja vu!?

2 posted on 07/30/2002 11:02:38 AM PDT by DestroyEraseImprove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *balkans
Index Bump
3 posted on 07/30/2002 11:27:47 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
Serbia
Sandzak

4 posted on 07/30/2002 11:38:48 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyEraseImprove
You're right. I wonder if the media will pick this up the same way they did with Kosovo.
5 posted on 07/30/2002 2:48:16 PM PDT by Dragonfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Dragonfly
I despise the term Sandzak. The area is called Rashka. The SDA they're talking about here is the very same SDA headed by the muslim fundamentalist Izetbegovich.

Serbia should repopulate Rashka the way Israelis do it - loads of kibbutzes, tax free life, weapons made available to every Serbian family, state subsidies for those who wish to move there, etc...

7 posted on 07/30/2002 11:08:05 PM PDT by Banat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
"Sandzak" has no coat of arms.
8 posted on 07/30/2002 11:09:24 PM PDT by Banat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Banat
"Sandzak" has no coat of arms.

Maybe it does. Check here.

9 posted on 07/30/2002 11:57:22 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
That is no coat of arms. God knows who came up with it. In Serbia, only the State (of Serbia) and Serbian Cities/Municipalities (Opshtinas) have CoAs.
10 posted on 07/31/2002 3:55:43 AM PDT by Banat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
Your coat of arms thing. I notice that one half has the fleur-de-lis - this appears to be identical to what the Bosnian Moslems adopted in 1991(?), so it would seem that there is no real historical precedence for the Sandzak 'coat of arms'.

VRN

11 posted on 07/31/2002 4:52:09 AM PDT by Voronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
"the reasons for Serb departures are economic but one certainly shouldn't overlook other reasons linked to the actions of the SDA."

It kind of reminds me of the expliantion used for those Serbs who were threateaned into leaving Kosovo back in the 60s. Those Serbs I know in Montnegro that were forced out back then would find this 'familiar'.

VRN

12 posted on 07/31/2002 4:55:39 AM PDT by Voronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voronin; Banat
The coat of arms is a Sandzak Separatist symbol and was/is unofficial (as of June 1999) unless the separatists took/take power.
13 posted on 07/31/2002 7:54:10 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
That is what I am talking about... Unofficial = illegal. There are no regions in Serbia and thus no regional CoAs.
14 posted on 07/31/2002 3:29:11 PM PDT by Banat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Banat
Unofficial = illegal.
Unofficial does not equal illegal. Every country has official and unofficial flags and symbols.
There are no regions in Serbia...
The regions of Serbia include: Vojvodina (Novi Sad), Central Serbia (Kraljevo), Western Serbia (Uzice), Northeastern Serbia (Smederevska Palanka), Eastern Serbia (Knjazevac), South Serbia (Leskovac), Sandzak (Novi Pazar).
...and thus no regional CoAs.
The above Coat of Arms is, at present, unofficial but it is recognized and accepted by Serbians regardless of what we think.
15 posted on 07/31/2002 5:19:38 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
Unofficial does not equal illegal. Every country has official and unofficial flags and symbols.

Serbia does not.

The regions of Serbia include: Vojvodina (Novi Sad), Central Serbia (Kraljevo), Western Serbia (Uzice), Northeastern Serbia (Smederevska Palanka), Eastern Serbia (Knjazevac), South Serbia (Leskovac), Sandzak (Novi Pazar).

Those are GEOGRAPHICAL, not administrative regions. It's like saying the Appalachians or the Midwest or the Death Valley. Of all these "regions", only Vojvodina is an administrative unit (Autonomous Province of Vojvodina) of the Republic of Serbia. Also, there is no mention of the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohia - another administrative unit of the Republic. Neither of the two mentioned Provinces has a CoA because the Constitution says they can't have it. Yugoslavia has its CoA, and so do Serbia and Montenegro as the republics that make up (the federal republic of) Yugoslavia.

The above Coat of Arms is, at present, unofficial but it is recognized and accepted by Serbians regardless of what we think.

Well, I am Serbian and I say you are wrong. It is not 'unofficial', it is illegal because the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia doesn't allow for any "regional" CoAs.

16 posted on 07/31/2002 5:59:40 PM PDT by Banat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Banat
Well, as many as 67% of the Serbian people have their opinion about the Coat of Arms.
Proposed Regions:

17 posted on 07/31/2002 7:09:27 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
"Well, as many as 67% of the Serbian people have their opinion about the Coat of Arms."

You can't be serious. "67% of the Serbian people"?!? So, I guess the population of "Sandzak" is 6.7 million, right?

Do you even know what/where "Sandzak" is? It doesn't "border Serbia and Montenegro". It is a phantom region made up of 10 municipalities - 5 of which are in the Republic of Serbia and 5 in the Republic of Montenegro. Needless to say, neither the government in Podgoritsa, nor the one in Belgrade recognises it. Only the local muslim fundamentalists do.

As far as the Proposal for the new Constitution, you don't have to remind me of its contents - I am a member of the party that proposed it and I'm quite familiar with it. The Proposal is not the Constitution. I don't know where you got the idea that it was. Serbia has its Constitution, which was proclaimed in 1990 and which will be in force until a new one is drafted and adopted.

18 posted on 07/31/2002 7:40:38 PM PDT by Banat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Banat
OK, there ain't no Sandzak and there ain't no Coat of Arms. You got me convinced.
20 posted on 07/31/2002 8:55:26 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson