[1_Of_We]

Being well aware of 'how free men behave' I observe that they are many times rather flippant when deciding what 'facts' will be included in the determination of 'objective reality'. Therefore 'objective reality' would not seem to be a very reliable source of morality. In fact I believe using that source would put us in the pre-biblical era.

"Why do you believe that the state has the moral authority to dictate the terms and conditions of a contract to which it is not a party?"

That would depend on which state we are considering.

[OWK]

That would depend on which state we are considering.

Why?