What difference does it make? The point is that it's rational for one to believe that there is a greater power in the world than naturalistic forces and man. The definition of that power is beyond the scope of evolutionary debate.
"Why should anyone who hasn't drunk the communion Kool-Aid accept the universe coming from a supernatural entity?"
Because it very obviously did. I don't think it takes much, just honesty, to admit that complex matter and life forms do not self-originate from nothing.
PS: Communion is recognized with either wine or grape juice, not "kool aid."
If Science announced proof of Brahma, Zeus, or Odin, you would still be anti-science. Do you know why?
The point is that it's rational for one to believe that there is a greater power in the world than naturalistic forces and man.
It is not rational to insist that science prove your creation myth.
The definition of that power is beyond the scope of evolutionary debate.
Translation: You have nothing to offer science except to demand that it cease to offend you.