[lasereye]

Really? Where are the important scientific creationist discoveries?

There's various creationist analyses showing how DNA creates insurmountable problems for the evolution model of random mutation, just to name one, not to mention the analysis of the fossil record. They're looking at the same things evolutionists look at claiming to show evidence for evolution, and saying no it doesn't. The new fossil "evidence" for homo sapiens evolution referred to in this article is a case in point.

[VadeRetro]

There's various creationist analyses showing how DNA creates insurmountable problems for the evolution model of random mutation, just to name one, not to mention the analysis of the fossil record.

IOW, "You'll never understand DNA! You'll never understand the fossil record!"

Again, what does "creation science" have to teach us worth a bowl of warm spit?

[PetiteMericco]

Indeed, you'd think these evolutionists would be grateful for the criticisms, considering that critique is a springboard for learning and advancement.

(But of course, we know why they are not.)

[VadeRetro]

They're looking at the same things evolutionists look at claiming to show evidence for evolution, and saying no it doesn't.

You can always do that, no matter how strong the evidence. That's why a defense lawyer can always make some kind of a speech to the jury that his client is an innocent victim of police persecution. It's called "creative writing." It isn't particularly science.