Why must you insult your correspondents this way? Threads of this type are not scientific discussions. They are philosophical discussions (when they are civil). I venture to say that none of the people on this thread are “professionals” on this subject. That’s evident from the level of the discourse and the “evidence” presented. Otherwise they are spitting contests with evolutionists calling their opponents names.
In view of your screen name, are you aware that J.R.R. Tolkien was a very devout Christian?
Why must you insult your correspondents this way?
Is that an insult? I did't think so. I just think such posts add nothing to the discussion. If she had posted quotations from the Koran or the Upanishads or Homer's Odyssey would it have meant any more or less?
Threads of this type are not scientific discussions. They are philosophical discussions (when they are civil). I venture to say that none of the people on this thread are “professionals” on this subject. That’s evident from the level of the discourse and the “evidence” presented.
I would tend to agree with that. Are we in fact arguing about the evidence?
Otherwise they are spitting contests with evolutionists calling their opponents names.
What "names" have I used to describe anyone but the three I mentioned? Have I insulted you?
In view of your screen name, are you aware that J.R.R. Tolkien was a very devout Christian?
Well "hurrah" for him if he thought it necessary. But, ont he other hand, why would you believe that I am not?