Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
Are you being intentionally dense? The "missing pelvis" isn't missing. Compare the creationist accounts with the actual bones on Thewissen's page.

I did – and found what you had pointed out as ironic. As for the “intentionally dense thing” Do I need to keep explaining things to you? (rhetorical)

Not something the fossil record can tell you about, but it clearly happened.

No, it did not clearly happen. You refute maybe 1 out of the 7 and conclude that it clearly happened? (rhetorical) Thanks for the insight to your dogma…

133 posted on 07/30/2002 4:10:16 PM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: Heartlander
You refute maybe 1 out of the 7 and conclude that it clearly happened? (rhetorical)

You have trouble with counting? (Not rhetorical)

135 posted on 07/30/2002 4:31:02 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson