Indirectly.
I've never seen him admit to even the slightest typo, misquote, or flub, let alone any factual error. I just wondered whether you had assessed RightWingNilla's (or VadeRetro's or Patrick Henry's, etc.) posts and his responses yourself and agreed with him every time, or whether, without regard of the facts in evidence or his personal approach to the debate, you were just cheering him on because he's on your "side".
Perhaps it was just a silly question.