[Orual]

My objection is that the example given at the beginning of the article is absolutely ridiculous. That would never happen and will never happen. What follows that opening therefore loses all credibility.

[BibChr]

Follow the logic, though. It isn't absurd at all, unless you have some thing about protecting homosexuality.

If it ALREADY IS against the law to THINK a certain way about homosexuality, then it certainly is no leap that it could become against the law to SPEAK a certain way.

It already is, in Canada. Did you not know that?

Dan

[a merkin]

In case you missed O'Reilly's national daytime radio broadcast a couple of weeks ago:

It's already against the law in Sweden for a preacher to invoke the Bible or any other religious text against the practice of homosexuality. A minister, priest or rabbi that does so can be arrested for a hate crime, according to Mr. O'Reilly.