Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gelato
Spending money for baggage handlers is not socialism.

But nationalizing an entire industry is.

125 posted on 07/28/2002 10:29:44 PM PDT by zeugma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: zeugma
What did they nationalize?
128 posted on 07/28/2002 10:38:31 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
But nationalizing an entire industry is

No, one could make the argument that that is fascism, but not socialism. Socialism--or more specifically, what is referred to in the article as the "New Deal"--is an economic/social principle.

I can understand a person disagreeing with federalizing the baggage handlers, and I personally think idea of letting the states take this one on is better. But even with that angle of criticism, I don't see how a person could assert that Bush is now a "New Deal Democrat." It makes no sense to me. And I’m no Bush apologist.

132 posted on 07/28/2002 11:13:03 PM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson