I won't answer for John, but I will ask you several questions in return.
Do ANY of the eyewitnesses or THEIR lawyers agree with you?
Do ANY of the victim's families or THEIR lawyers agree with you?
And WHY do you ignore the factual evidence presented thus far and continue to behave as if you have a legitimate argument?
'I won't answer for John, but I will ask you several questions in return. Do ANY of the eyewitnesses or THEIR lawyers agree with you?
Let's find out. Tell us who their lawyers are I'll provide them with The "Missile Witnesses" Myth.
"Do ANY of the victim's families or THEIR lawyers agree with you?"
The lawyers retained by the families are some of the best and most highly qualified legal experts in such matters to be found anywhere in the world. Experts know what they're doing. Amateurs don't.
"And WHY do you ignore the factual evidence presented thus far and continue to behave as if you have a legitimate argument?"
Those of you promoting the "shootdown" notion have been unable for over six years now to convince even one member of congress, past or present, that you have a "case", much less that you have supporting "factual evidence" or "legitimate arguments". John Fiorentino says he also hasn't yet seen any compelling evidence that Flight 800 was the victim of a missile shootdown. Trying to jam your "case" down peoples' throats hasn't been productive for the dwindling handful of you still trying to promote the stillborn "shootdown" notion either, has it. Under the circumstances, your last sentence has obviously not been proven to be factual.