[JohnFiorentino]

So, we can assume from this rather self appreciative advertisement that the resulting cartoon fabrication was a well thought out, meticulously documented INTENTIONAL FRAUD.

Is that the way you read it?

[Asmodeus]

"So, we can assume from this rather self appreciative advertisement that the resulting cartoon fabrication was a well thought out, meticulously documented INTENTIONAL FRAUD."

How would you describe these graphics which you obviously consider to also be non-factual "cartoons", keeping in mind your earlier comments documented below:

Yahoo TWA800 forum - 15 March 2002
From: John Fiorentino
Subject: Re: [twa800] A little sensitive, aren't we?
[excerpt][quote][emphasis added - caps yours]
However, based on Meyer's statements, I don't believe he witnessed the IE. Fl. 800 didn't explode in a MF at 13000+, the MF was somewhere 7500-8500ft. Look at his timeline, Please explain, HOW he could have witnessed the IE?
[end quote]

Yahoo TWA800 forum - April 12, 2002
From: John Fiorentino
Subject: Re: [twa800] Kabofovic revisited
[excerpt][quote][emphasis added]
Most here are convinced a "missile" did the dirty deed. I'm not, not yet at least. The initial assessment was "bomb". I thought so to. I still do.
[end quote]