[JohnFiorentino]

"you had nearly six years to study the evidence by then."

Your assumptions here, are just that........I was quite embroiled in research for another book at the time of the incident, and actually am still in the process of updating that work.

My "study" of the evidence, up until several years ago, was cursory at best.

[Asmodeus]

Your reply #568:
"Asmodeus believes it is 'immaterial' that the very organizations which produced video portrayals of Fl800's demise--video's which he himself calls "untenable"--should on the other hand be believed when they present their 'conclusions' re: the causation of the air disaster. [emphasis added]

The videos had nothing to do with the "causation of the disaster". Nor were they presented to the public as evidence of the cause of the disaster. Nor were they prepared for the purpose of proving the cause of the disaster.

____________________

Your reply #569:
"My 'study' of the evidence, up until several years ago, was cursory at best." [emphasis added]

So you admit that you, the Great Paralegl (GREPAR), still have not seen any compelling evidence that Flight 800 was the victim of a missile or bomb after SEVERAL YEARS of examining the evidence presented by the NTSB and the evidence presented by the "shootdown" tinfoil hats and the evidence you developed during your own "expert" investigation of the disaster.

The "Missile Witnesses" Myth