Asmodeus says.....
As you know, my answer to that question was that "although the absence of any credible eyewitness support for the re-creation videos is evidence that the fiery events in them are inaccurately depicted, it is not evidence that the rest of the sequence of events including the loss of the nose section and the so called "zoom climb" depicted in them is inaccurate".
I say:......But YOUR timeline does rule out a "zoom-climb"
There is a continuing dispute between those who say yes which includes the NTSB experts and those who say no who are most if not all "shootdown" tinfoil hats. Frankly, that issue appears to me to be immaterial because [1] neither of the video's were ever intended to be proof of the cause of the crash, [2] the overwhelming evidence that the 747 was not the victim of a missile or bomb, and [3] the tinfoil hats haven't been able to present any compelling evidence to the contrary.
"Frankly, that issue appears to me to be immaterial"
What an interesting line of reasoning. Asmodeus believes it is "immaterial" that the very organizations which produced video portrayals of Fl800's demise--video's which he himself calls "untenable"--should on the other hand be believed when they present their "conclusions" re: the causation of the air disaster.
And just what sort of tinfoil hat are YOU JF?
I would consider Asmodeus and yourself to be raving tinhatters well before I'd consider Commander Donaldson to be such..
Commander Donaldson HAS presented an enourmous amount of evidence that TWA800 was shot down by SEVERAL missiles, evidence that you and your brethren continue to ignore and claim doesn't exist.