Psst. That's not the question you asked me in #115 which was as follows:
"So, if you are correct my dear Asmodeus, you are stating that the CIA, NTSB videos are GARBAGE......is that accurate?" [emphasis yours]
As you know, my answer to that question was that "although the absence of any credible eyewitness support for the re-creation videos is evidence that the fiery events in them are inaccurately depicted, it is not evidence that the rest of the sequence of events including the loss of the nose section and the so called "zoom climb" depicted in them is inaccurate". The readers will note that my answer is applicable to both of your questions.
"As far as clicking on any of your links, I have neither the time nor desire."
Really? The readers will find it interesting - for two reasons - to compare side by side your 6 July 2002 posting to the Yahoo TWA800 forum with The "Missile Witnesses" Myth.
"The CIA, NTSB cartoons were produced to explain' the witness reports." [emphasis added]
Four of the "shootdown" tinfoil hats' own "cartoons" are included in http://www.100megspopup.com/ark/800Graphics.html.
"THE MALICIOUS ATTACK ON MY COMPUTER INITIATED THIS MORNING SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE PROPER LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES. ALTHOUGH THE ATTACK WAS QUITE VICIOUS, AS YOU CAN SEE, THOSE WHO PERPETRATED IT HAVE NOT SUCCEEDED IN QUASHING EITHER MY POSTS, NOR WILL THEY THWART MY INVESTIGATION. CRIME REALLY DOESN'T PAY BOYS, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU LEAVE SO MANY FINGERPRINTS BEHIND." [emphasis yours]
Although you appear to indicate the hacking of your computer is self evident in your posting, it appears to be your usual style of posting in FreeRepublic to me. What are the readers supposed to "see"? Aside from that I agree that anyone whose computer is "hacked" or the target of a virus attack should promply report it to their Internet Service Provider and the appropriate law enforcement authorities. It would also be helpful to provide the readers with more details.