Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jlogajan
...Heh heh. Right. Calculate based on the assumption that the airframe is rotating in a vacuum and see how seriously you are taken. ha ha ha

Apparently your position is not taken so seriously at NTSB as they do not subscribe to your objection. So I repeat, why the strawman about torque calculation? The FOIA denial was not based on that non-issue (to the NTSB that is, the only party who's opinion really matters).

With regards to the FOIA request, there need be no showing of a contrary position to that held by the government. The request is made to release information which is not secret. Surely a Libertarian believes in government accountability and government openness. You are intent on avoiding the purpose of this thread, which was the denial of a FOIA request. NTSB took the requester seriously enough to refuse the release, not on the basis of some phantom torque variable, but its intent to safeguard proprietary Boeing data.

119 posted on 07/29/2002 7:58:52 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze
Surely a Libertarian believes in government accountability and government openness.

I believe in the laws of physics -- a concept that has apparently escaped the good Captain Lahr in all its details.

120 posted on 07/29/2002 10:40:56 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson