1. That I am a sovereign Citizen of Colorado, which is a legal standing specified in Article IV, Section 2, clause 1 of the federal Constitution, ratified in 1789.2. That I am not now, nor have I ever knowingly agreed to be, a "United States citizen subject to the jurisdiction thereof," as created by the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution. I hereby dissolve, revoke and terminate any implied contracts between myself and any corporate entities, including and especially the corporate fiction that bears my name, which was created without my knowledge or permission.
[and so forth]
12. I am reserving my rights without prejudice by UCC 1-207 and their statute court and the statute that I have violated, must have an injured party, and since there is no injured party, or complaining witness, the court has no jurisdiction under Common Law. This Statue Court made a legal determination that it has the authority under the jurisdiction that it is operating, to ignore two sections of the Uniform Commercial Code which I will call to its attention and I will put him and the court on notice that I will appeal his legal determination, and that if I am damaged by his action, I will sue him under the jurisdiction of the UCC. My recourse appears in the Uniform Commercial Code at 1-103-6, which says: "The Code is complimentary to the Common Law, which remains in force, except where displaced by the code. A statute should be construed in harmony with the Common Law, unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law. I am instructing you now to add this to my appeal. I am making explicit reservation of my rights at 1-207, and I insist that the statutes be construed in harmony with the Common Law. If this court will not allow the Constitution and the Supreme Law of the Land to guide its hand and the Jury instructions that he gave, I am forced to defend with the Statute Jurisdiction/Admiralty jurisdiction that he has forced upon me and which the UNIFORM COMNMERCIAL CODE is the overriding authority for his actions. To say that I am unhappy that I was never advised by the Court regarding this issue, is something that will be addressed in Judge Patterson's Court, and the appeal that I will file after the sentencing.
Oh boy! I tried to use the “I am a Sovereign Citizen of the State of Texas” line a couple of decades back. I also tried to use the “do you want me to identify myself, Your Honor, because you are a party to the action” line too when called in court. It didn’t work back then either, though it did manage to irritate two judges. I’m not opposed to someone trying. Just make sure you are single and have nothing better to do with your time because it WILL be occupied in the near future. Mine was, anyway.
Also, if it has to do with income taxes, (I realize this instance doesn’t) just make sure you don’t have a bank account or nice car or property that can be seized. They will get theirs – not today, but they will…
OTOH, I routinely carried a holstered pistol in Oregon. At the time they only prohibited “concealed” weapons. A holstered weapon, or a rifle in a gun rack in your pickup, was not concealed, and therefore not illegal. I never had a problem with the local LEOs or anyone else. They may have changed it since – don’t take my word for it. I also routinely carried a shotgun in the gun rack of my truck to high school in Texas too, but I’ll bet you don’t do that anymore.
I’ll admit that it is fun to watch from a distance… though the end result is sort of predictable.